Gabriella
Fecher
Reflection
Before this semester, I did not
adequately draw a strong connection between democracy and the classroom. Throughout the experiences of Teaching Towards
Democracy, however, I now realize that democracy is an integral component to
the learning process. American society
thrives on values of democracy, capitalism, and Protestantism. These values, then, are both directly and
indirectly woven into every aspect of life, including the school system. When we enter into the classroom, we have our
own biases based on our values throughout our lives. These biases will influence how we teach.
While it is impossible to completely remove those biases, we must be
aware of them and work to limit their power as much as possible.
Democracy
is centered on particular values of deliberation, compromise, and
diversity. This third value is a crucial
component. Differences are essential to
a strong democracy. We should be
welcoming multiple voices and multiculturalism.
Democracy, after all, is
rooted in the “principle of moral, self-directing individuality” (Dewey, 1987,
p. 377). Curriculum, then, should be
taught in a way that “values the full range of learning and thinking abilities”
and provides freedom for individual growth (Sternberg, 2001, p. 338). Democracies should exist securely within the
classroom, encouraging students to “be willing and able to work with others
cooperatively” and effectively voice their individual positions. Students will be coming
into the classroom with different values, ideas, beliefs, and needs. Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model
recognizes the interrelationships between different influences in an individual’s
life—both immediate influences and broader influences like societal
values. All of these influences affect
human development, and influence the mind and behavior of the individual
(Gauvain and Cole, 2005). We need to
recognize that the home-life and other factors in a student’s life is going to
have an effect on how they learn in the classroom. Schools
“form one of several institutional linkages” between the household and the
public sphere for students (Dreeben, 2001, p. 88). As a result, we must work to create an
environment that best teaches principles of democracy, diversity, and
individuality that will help students to see new perspectives. Rather than closing off ideas or individuals
that do not support the majority perspective, we should embrace the
differences. Their individual voices
have to stand out, as well as their individual strengths and needs.
Our students are different. Some of these differences are more directly
obvious than others, but all are different, regardless. One sure way to encourage these differences
is allowing multiculturalism within the classroom. A classroom setting, as its
own unique micro-culture, is comprised of “considerable diversity” with
cultures and perceptions of cultures “distributed
among people in a group” (Corsao and Eder, 1990, p. 211). In acknowledgement of this fact, educators
need to be both prepared for, supportive of, and active towards differences
between students.
Our classrooms should
be multicultural and as unbiased in nature as possible in order to promote an
equitable, learning environment for all.
Postmodern ideals include the value of difference rather than
universality and regularity. There is
strength in diversity.
The advocacy project helped me to
understand the role of colleagueship and collaboration. Our group had to investigate societal norms,
identify existing power structures, and speak out for change. We investigated subjects through a narrow
lens at the beginning, and unveiled an issue far bigger than we previously
considered. We had to work as a team,
remain flexible in shifting goals, collectively generate ideas, and evaluate
differences and commonalities. This project
provided real-world experience and highlighted the importance of collaboration. Our group, Girls on the Move, was organized
to raise awareness about existing stereotypes about women in sports. We created a blog, spoke out on social media,
and made a movie highlighting the existing problems and our efforts to change
existing stereotypes. To view our project, check out: Girls on the Move Blog and Video.
Colleagueship
became particularly interesting to me when I considered the possibility that I
will not be assuredly working in schools with many resources or structures in
place. Some school districts provide
multi-tier systems of support (RTI) that allows for differentiated instruction
as well as additional supports for varying interventions. These types of systems are important to “activate
homeschool-community relationships and bring together partners” that ultimately
encourage success from students through encouraging relationships between
schools and services (Averill and Rinaldi, 2011). It is possible that I will go
into a school district that does not provide
these resources or connections. It is
still my responsibility, at that point, to foster connections and work to
provide resources that allow for the best learning experiences for my students. As an advocate for my students, I need to be
regularly seeking out areas of current inequity and encouraging my students to
do the same. In these inequities, we
will undoubtedly find skewed power systems and outliers that have probably been
overlooked.
Advocacy is a vital component of
being an educator. We must advocate for
our students as individuals. We need to
be providing opportunities for growth and success. We should be participating in the community,
and encourage our students to have both a social and learning community, as
well. It is our responsibility to hear
our students and advocate for them. They
should know that their thoughts and feelings are important, and they should
contribute.
Undoubtedly, to not
advocate for the individual’s needs is to subject them to “feelings of
alienation, isolation, and exclusion” or encourage them to bend to peer
pressure and majority beliefs (Ribak-Rosenthal, 1994). Our expectations for our students, and our
encouragement for our students, translates to them. They need to know that they have a voice, and
that voice should be heard.
Teaching Towards
Democracy has been one of my favorite education classes thus far. It challenged my way of thinking and
perceiving the world around me. We were
encouraged to critically listen, identify problems, participate in discussions
even in uncomfortable roles, and advocate for those around us. I came away, realizing more than ever that
teaching may bring up many uncomfortable situations. To really
value difference and democracy, we have to embrace individuality. That may entail standing against a
majority. It may mean that we have to
stand up and speak up when no one else does.
It also may mean that we have to stand up against traditionally accepted
ideas and norms. However, it is our
responsibility to do all these things, and to teach our students to do the
same.
Works Cited
Averill, O., & Rinaldi, C.
(2011). Multitier System of Supports. District Administration Magazine.
Professional Media Group, 15.
Corsao, William A. and Donna
Eder. (1990). Children’s Peer
Cultures. Annual Reviews Inc.
Dewey, John. (1987).
Democracy in Education. McGraw-Hill
Higher Education.
Diabetes Foundation. Advocacy. 2016. Image. Web. 10 May 2016.
https://www.msdiabetes.org/advocacy-0.
Dreeben, Robert. (2001). The
Contribution of Schooling to the Learning of Norms: Independence, Achievement,
Universalism, and Specificity. Prentice-Hall,
NJ.
Gauvain, M. &
Cole, M. (2005). Readings on the Development of Children. New York: Worth.
Multicultural
Council of Saskatchewan. Strength in
Diversity. 2016. Image. Web. 10 May 2016. http://mcos.ca/saskatchewan-multicultural-week-2015/.
Ribak-Rosenthal, N., &
Russell, T.T. (1994). Dealing with Religious Differences in December: A School
Counselor’s Role. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 28 (4), 295-301.
Sternberg, R. & Grigorenko, E. (1999). Learning Disabilities, Schooling, and Society. Reading: Perseus
Books.


No comments:
Post a Comment